Charlotte IBC Totes

Methodology

Here is the math. Tell us where we're wrong.

Every number on our ledger traces back to a public source or a yard-floor measurement. This page shows the working. If you think our assumptions are off, email us — we publish corrections.

Price my load · 2 minutes

Fill this and our yard manager replies the same business day.

US/Canada format: (555) 123-4567
US zip (12345) or Canada (A1A 1A1)

By submitting you agree we may email you once about your request.

Per-tote breakdown

Line itemEstimateBasis
Virgin HDPE resin (42 kg / tote)≈ 78 kg CO₂eEmbodied emissions of HDPE resin. Ref: PlasticsEurope, 2020.
Galvanized steel cage (28 kg)≈ 62 kg CO₂ePrimary steel + galvanization process. Ref: worldsteel LCI, 2021.
Composite pallet (wood or steel, 18 kg)≈ 14 kg CO₂eMixed material average, Southeast US sourcing.
Valve + fittings (brass / poly)≈ 8 kg CO₂eSmall parts, average composition.
Manufacture assembly energy≈ 32 kg CO₂eFactory grid mix, TX / LA average.
Freight, factory → distributor≈ 72 kg CO₂eDiesel truck, 1,100 mi average to Carolinas.
Sub-total: new 275-gal IBC≈ 266–330 kg CO₂eDepending on options and freight distance.
Reconditioned tote: wash + test + label≈ 18 kg CO₂eOur closed-loop wash water recovers ~94%.
Reconditioned tote: return freight (avg)≈ 14 kg CO₂eAvg delivery inside our matched-route radius.
Sub-total: reconditioned tote≈ 32 kg CO₂eRoughly 10% of a new tote.
Rebottled tote: new HDPE bottle≈ 78 kg CO₂eSame resin impact as new, but only for the bottle.
Rebottled tote: cage reuse + assembly≈ 28 kg CO₂eStraighten + new gaskets + test.
Rebottled tote: freight≈ 14 kg CO₂eSame matched-route avg.
Sub-total: rebottled tote≈ 120 kg CO₂eRoughly 40% of a new tote.

How we roll up to the ledger

For each loop (reuse, rebottle, rework, recycle) we apply the per-tote delta against our running count of totes processed in that loop. For 2020–2026 the cumulative numbers are:

  • Reused: 19,840 totes × avg 270 kg CO₂e savings ≈ 5,357 tons
  • Rebottled: 4,212 totes × avg 180 kg CO₂e savings ≈ 758 tons
  • Reworked (fab): 2,108 totes × avg 240 kg CO₂e savings ≈ 505 tons
  • Recycled: 1,321 totes × avg 200 kg CO₂e savings ≈ 264 tons
  • Additional avoided transport & handling: ≈ 1,641 tons
  • Total: ≈ 8,525 tons CO₂e avoided

What this number isn't

It isn't a claim that we personally sequestered 8,525 tons of carbon. It's a claim that our activity caused 8,525 tons of CO₂e not to be emitted — because a reused tote displaces a new tote.

It also isn't a net-zero claim. Our own yard, trucks, and equipment emit real carbon. We haven't published those yet (we're working on it), but they're well under the avoided number.

Sources and caveats

  • HDPE resin impact: PlasticsEurope Eco-Profile for HDPE, 2020.
  • Steel cage impact: worldsteel LCI data for galvanized steel, 2021.
  • Freight impact: EPA SmartWay truck emissions factor, 2024.
  • Wash water recovery: measured at our facility via flow metering.
  • Pallet impact: regional average, mixed wood / steel / composite.

Peer review wanted

If you're a sustainability professional and you'd like to audit our methodology, we'd love that. Email us — we'll send you the full working spreadsheet. We publish corrections prominently.

Additional line items: the full picture

The table above covers the major line items, but a complete lifecycle analysis includes several secondary factors. Here are the additional items we track:

Line itemEstimateBasis
Zinc for galvanization (2.5 kg per cage)≈ 12 kg CO₂eZinc production energy, ILZRO data 2019.
Water consumption for new IBC mfg≈ 60 galFactory water use for molding, cooling, testing. NAPCOR 2020.
Water consumption for reconditioning≈ 35 galOur closed-loop wash system measurement, net of reclamation.
Wash water treatment (our facility)≈ 0.8 kg CO₂ePumping + carbon filtration + pH adjustment energy.
Caustic detergent production≈ 1.2 kg CO₂eNaOH-based detergent, per-tote consumption rate.
Label printing and application≈ 0.3 kg CO₂eNegligible but we track it — printer energy + label stock.
Valve replacement (per tote)≈ 2.1 kg CO₂eBrass or poly valve body manufacturing impact.
Gasket replacement (per tote)≈ 0.4 kg CO₂eViton or EPDM gasket manufacturing impact.
Electric tug (intra-yard transport)≈ 0.2 kg CO₂eGrid electricity for EV charging, per-tote share.
Solar offset (our rooftop PV)≈ -1.8 kg CO₂eCredit for avoided grid electricity, 22 kW system, per-tote share.
Drop-trailer diesel (avg delivery)≈ 14 kg CO₂eEPA SmartWay factor, per-tote share of avg delivery distance.
Box truck diesel (local delivery)≈ 4.2 kg CO₂eEPA SmartWay factor for medium truck, avg local route.
End-of-life recycling energy (HDPE grind)≈ 8.5 kg CO₂eShredder + granulator electricity, per-bottle.
End-of-life recycling energy (steel shred)≈ 3.2 kg CO₂eHydraulic shear + baler electricity, per-cage.
Re-pelletization at downstream mill≈ 18 kg CO₂eEstimated from HDPE pelletization energy data. Not our facility.
EAF steel re-melt at Cayce mill≈ 22 kg CO₂eEstimated from EAF energy per ton of scrap. Not our facility.

Sensitivity analysis: what if our assumptions are off?

Every carbon calculation has assumptions. Here is how our total changes if key assumptions shift by ±20%:

AssumptionBase case-20%+20%Impact on total
HDPE resin emission factor1.86 kg CO₂e/kg1.492.23±9.8% on new-tote baseline
Steel cage emission factor2.21 kg CO₂e/kg1.772.65±6.4% on new-tote baseline
Avg freight distance (new tote)1,100 miles880 mi1,320 mi±4.2% on new-tote baseline
Wash energy per tote22 kWh17.6 kWh26.4 kWh±1.1% on reconditioned total
Matched-route utilization68%54%82%±3.5% on delivery carbon
Reuse-to-recycle split72% reuse / 28% other58% / 42%86% / 14%±12% on total avoided CO₂e

The most sensitive assumption is the reuse-to-recycle split. If we reuse fewer totes (and recycle more), total avoided CO₂e drops by up to 12%. This reinforces why maximizing reuse — not recycling — is the core of our strategy.

Comparison with industry competitors

How does our carbon performance compare to other IBC reconditioning operations? Direct comparisons are difficult because most competitors don't publish their methodology. Here is what we can estimate:

MetricCharlotte IBC TotesLarge national reconditioner (est.)Buy-new baseline
CO₂e per reconditioned tote32 kg55–75 kg310 kg (new)
Landfill rate0%5–10% (est.)N/A
Wash water reclamation94%40–70% (est.)N/A
Avg delivery distance< 200 mi300–800 mi (est.)1,100 mi (factory to SE)
Solar offsetYes (22 kW)VariesVaries
Published methodologyYes (this page)RarelyN/A

National reconditioner estimates are based on industry reports and our own experience with former customers of those operations. We cannot verify their internal data. The comparison is offered in good faith, not as competitive positioning.

Year-over-year progress

How our cumulative avoided emissions have grown since we started tracking:

YearTotes processedCO₂e avoided (tons)Cumulative (tons)
20202,140612612
20213,4801,0281,640
20224,8201,4453,085
20235,6101,6804,765
20245,9801,8126,577
20255,4511,9488,525
2026 (YTD)8,525+

The increase in CO₂e avoided per tote from 2020 to 2025 reflects improvements in our reuse-to-recycle ratio (more totes going to reuse vs. recycling) and shorter average delivery distances as our matched-route program matured.

What we haven't published yet (and when we will)

  • Scope 1 emissions (our trucks, gas heating): Estimated at approximately 55–65 metric tons CO₂ per year. We plan to publish a verified number by end of 2026.
  • Scope 2 emissions (grid electricity): Estimated at approximately 15–20 metric tons CO₂ per year (net of solar). Also targeted for 2026 publication.
  • Scope 3 emissions (upstream supply chain): We have not yet attempted to calculate Scope 3. It would include the emissions embedded in the new HDPE bottles we buy for rebottling, the diesel consumed by our carrier partners, and the emissions from downstream recycling operations. This is a 2027–2028 project.
  • Water footprint: We track water consumption and reclamation operationally, but we have not yet calculated a formal water footprint per ISO 14046. Planned for 2027.
Get
a Quote